OFFICIAL PROPOSAL UPDATE: USING ABANDONED LAND AS A TEMPORARY SANDBOX
tracked
rottweiler Lednev
OFFICIAL PROPOSAL UPDATE: USING ABANDONED LAND AS A TEMPORARY SANDBOX
I want to propose an alternate, secondary function for these abandoned Mainland parcels when they aren't actively being rented. We can turn these empty zones into a high-value, hyper-secure benefit for current Mainland landholders: A Shared Temporary Sandbox System.
How the Sandbox System Works:
If an abandoned parcel is sitting empty, Linden Lab’s backend can read a user's account data to verify if they are a paying Mainland owner or tenant. If they are, and they have available, unused tier/prims (Land Impact) on their account, they can temporarily utilize that empty parcel as a quick sandbox to rez items.
To ensure this system remains highly secure, appropriate, and lag-free, it will feature the following hard-coded protocols:
Maturity Rating Lock (Moderate and Adult Only): To prevent content violations and ensure compliance with grid policies, this temporary sandbox feature will only be available on Moderate (Mature) and Adult regions. General-rated regions will be excluded entirely from the sandbox pool to protect the family-friendly nature of those areas.
Aggressive Auto-Return Timers: These temporary sandboxes will feature an un-bypassable, system-enforced 30-to-60-minute auto-return timer. The exact millisecond an object is rezzed, a countdown begins. Once it hits zero, the items are instantly deleted from the simulator and returned to the user's inventory. This guarantees the land stays 100% clean.
Instant Grief-Reporting & Account Blocking: Because access is strictly locked behind verified Mainland accounts, accountability is absolute. The system will feature an instant "Report Griefing" option. If a user uses the space to deploy malicious scripts, lag-machines, or particle spammers, the system will immediately execute a Parcel Ban and temporarily block their account from using any automated sandbox close by.
This turns ugly, abandoned eyesores into a premium, secure, and appropriately gated perk for paying Mainland residents without creating any extra work for the Linden support staff.
Option B make it available to premium members only as a perk.
Then users are more likely to want premium.
Why Gating This to Premium Drives Real Revenue (The Math)
Looking at SL’s metrics, we have roughly 500,000+ monthly active users. Estimates show that only about 15% to 20% of those users actually pay for Premium. That means there's a massive pool of over 400,000 Basic accounts currently paying $0 in subscriptions.
We already know utility drives upgrades. When Linden Lab launched Bellisseria, Premium subs spiked instantly because people wanted the exclusive housing perk.
If we use that same logic here and convert just a tiny fraction of those basic users:
0.5% Upgrade Rate (2,000 users): At $11.99/mo, that’s an extra $23,980/month.
1% Upgrade Rate (4,000 users): That’s an extra $47,960/month.
Annual Impact: A simple 1% conversion adds nearly $575,000 a year in pure, high-margin profit.
Since the Lab is already paying the server costs to keep these abandoned mainland sims turned on anyway, turning them into a Premium-only sandbox perk costs $0 in new infrastructure but creates a massive financial incentive to upgrade. It turns a total money drain into a huge sales driver.
Log In
Oatmeal Linden
marked this post as
tracked
Hello, and thank you for your feature request.
Incoming suggestions are reviewed in the order they are received by a team of Lindens with diverse areas of expertise. We consider a number of factors: Is this change possible? Will it increase lag? Will it break existing content? Is it likely that the number of residents using this feature will justify the time to develop it? This wiki page further describes the reasoning we use: Feature Requests
This particular suggestion, unfortunately, cannot be tackled at this time. However, we regularly review previously deferred suggestions when circumstances change or resources become available.
We are grateful for the time you took to submit this feature request. We hope that you are not discouraged from submitting others in the future. Many excellent ideas to improve Second Life come from you, our residents. We can’t do it alone.
Thank you for your continued commitment to Second Life.
Bavid Dailey
i don't think I'd want my neigboring parcel turned into a sandbox thank you
rottweiler Lednev
Bavid Dailey Makes sense perhaps that why lindens reply in this chat says what it says they have to factor in all things. In the past there was changes that cause a loss of people regions and money So I can understand why no change is better then a fast change. Like you said might make the game not enjoyable for others who rent. Potential things in the past seems like a good idea and might have lost money I put a list bellow of them. So I will take this things you said into consideration next time I make a idea I will admit I did not think about land owners only the thought about the enjoyment of players in hopes game I like wont ever end.
I don't know how accurate this info bellow is I just use AI to generate quick information for reference so bare with me it's more speculation but give a idea of what you said and the impacts.
The OpenSpace Price Hike (2008): Linden Lab raised fees on cheap regions by 67%. Landlords couldn't pay, causing thousands of regions to be deleted overnight in mass protest.
The "Bellissaria" Free Homes: The Lab started giving away beautiful, free homes to Premium members. Tenants left private rentals, forcing independent landlords to drop their land.
The Gambling & Banking Bans (2007): Sudden bans wiped out virtual casinos and banks. Owners had no business left and immediately abandoned hundreds of high-tier regions.
High Monthly Fees: Keeping a private region costs over $200/month. Whenever real-world inflation hits, hobbyists drop their sims and quit because it's too expensive.