Web/Marketplace Features

Marketplace and SL websites
  • Search existing ideas before submitting
  • Use support.secondlife.com for customer support issues
  • Keep posts on-topic
Thank you for your ideas!
Flag Creator and Block Store option
There is so many stores selling ripped items, AI generated content and blatant false advertising, it has flooded the market. Yet LL relies on people to report individual products. When players see how convoluted it is to report stuff they just close the tab and opt to just not shop. Its a great deterrent to keep people from shopping for digital junk we dont need.... Marketplace was never great but it is now unusable with the amount of garbage clogging it up. Make every ones life easier and allow players to flag entire stores for review in the individual listing reports. Just add a check box so players can indicate that the issue persists across all their products. Put in a mandatory check box for creators to tag their products as AI assisted or photoshopped so we know what we're getting, and are able to filter out AI if we do not want to support that kind of content. Generally if one product is being misrepresented, ripped, or falsely advertised....the majority of their content is. If a creator gets flagged enough times it should trigger a review of all their products on market. If they do not pass review then unlist their listings and auto pop a warning when they log into market to make corrections or provide an explanation of the products they're selling. Then after all that...just give us a block creator option. I dont want to see the 5 pages of AI generated porn textures being sold with word spam, when I am looking for shoes.
89
·
Marketplace
Provide an e-commerce dashboard with useable data for product sellers
For quick understanding, I've condensed the longer form of this request into two bullet point lists. Further explanation is under the --- dashes. The request: A Marketplace dashboard giving shop owners access to keyword-level performance data, including which search terms are actually driving views and sales for their products, and ideally would also give: - Visibility into sale source: Whether a purchase came from an on-Marketplace search or an external link (blog post, social media ad, etc.) - Click-through rate data: How many people click a product after seeing it in search results Why it would help: Creators could tailor product descriptions and tags to real search behaviour, reducing reliance on black-hat SEO tactics like keyword spamming Customers would get more relevant search results, since accurate tagging cuts down on products cluttering irrelevant searches Linden Lab would gain clearer data for revenue projections based on search volume Linden Lab could use the data to improve the Marketplace itself: Better semantic search, keyword clarity, and moderation against mistagged items Linden Lab could also use modern, standard e-commerce functionality as a selling point to attract new users to Second Life --- When it comes to understanding keyword performance, where users come from for sales, and even the click-through rate (how often someone clicks on a product after seeing it in the search) for products listed on the marketplace, there is no good measurement through the marketplace itself. The closest to a dashboard function we have is the Top Selling Products and Top Searched Products reports, which do not provide extra data besides what I can assume for the latter to be views in all searches for said products. While it would technically be possible to manually calculate a click-through rate, this would take a lot of time and manual processing. Meanwhile, other digital e-commerce platforms provide this data as standard, as well as often including further information about where those customers came from (e.g. on-platform searches or external links). Coming from a digital marketing background, where Google Analytics and Google Search Console, alongside in-house dashboards from Shopify and Amazon, provide these details and more, I have seen first-hand the value this adds to a brand when it comes to targeting a specific audience, reaching wider ranges of potential customers, and building brand awareness. I understand that this would be an undertaking for Linden Lab. However, the creators are a driving force behind the Second Life economy, and giving us tools to better parse and understand what is doing well and what isn't would be inherently useful and mutually beneficial for the customers, for the creators, and for Linden Lab alike. Having this data would mean brands would be able to understand how customers search for products better, be able to include those keywords in a useful and meaningful way in their product descriptions and product tags, and would be empowered to use less black-hat SEO methods (e.g. keyword spamming, incorrect keywords) for effective reach. This in turn would improve the customer experience on the marketplace, which is often a negative experience thanks to incorrect keyword tagging resulting in items showing in irrelevant searches. Then, this would assist Linden Lab in three ways: Giving clearer data into what users are looking for on the marketplace, allowing for better revenue projection based on search volumes, etc. Allow for better monitoring and improvements to the marketplace, e.g. improving keyword clarity, implementing proper semantic search, preventing customer exhaustion and irritation through proper moderation and action against incorrectly tagged items. Using this functionality as a recruitment method to draw in new users for Second Life, as it would better align with modern business standards on a digital economy and e-commerce platform. For clarity: I am not asking for a method to promote black hat SEO practises (e.g. using irrelevant keywords to show on incorrect searches, backlink abuse to rank higher into searches, etc.). I am asking for Linden Lab to provide a marketplace dashboard that gives shop owners the ability to know what terms are performing best for their products on a keyword basis, the ability to see if a sale was made via a marketplace search or arrived from an external one (e.g. a blogpost, or social media advertising), and how many people click through to an item once it is seen on the marketplace search. As link posting does not work here, I would advise Linden Lab and others to look at demonstrations of how Google Search Console and Analytics works, as well as other e-commerce platforms. Finally: I have checked through the merchant center and have not found anything that would give this level of functionality. However, if it does exist, then I would love to be referred to it.
3
·
Marketplace
·
tracked
Add marketplace policy regarding AI generated content
So going into this, I want to disclaim that I myself am not against AI. I personally have used it before, and will do so in the future. A specific chat AI helps me regularly with solving problems. However, I am against people intentionally misleading people about content, and polluting search results with content made in mere seconds, and find it no different than spam. If I made something that randomly generated randomly colored squares on a white canvas, and listed it a dozen or so times, it'd be seen as spam. Additionally, this issue was brought up in the SL Discord marketplace chat. I've moved it here so that it can get more recognition and visibility to LL. Personally, I believe that a policy worded like so would benefit everyone in the long run (canny has messed up some formatting here, so it looks like it has no line breaks, these have been substituted with "---" for readability) Content that is the sole generation of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, or otherwise Generative Content, except in the cases where the generator was written for the sole purpose of generating a specific element, may not be listed on the Marketplace as-is or as the focal point of the content that is listed. --- AI images must never be used to generate listing images, and must be presented as the content appears in SL. Overlays, such as permission information, price, branding labels, or sales labels, are permitted as much so as they do not mis-represent the content that is being advertised. --- Examples of forbidden listings: * In singular or collection, AI generated content as a texture, image, mesh, sound or other type of asset, as the sole content being listed. * A AI generated image in a picture frame. * A museum prefab filled with AI generated images as a "ready to go" model. * A object that plays randomly generated AI voice clips. * Attempting to pass off or mislead people that AI generated content as original, hand crafted content. * A listing which shows a AI enhanced product preview. --- Examples of allowed listings: * A house that has a AI generated poster in it, where the poster is not the selling point of the house. * A museum model that has some AI generated images, or is focused on the topic of AI generated content. * A NPC, that among other features, plays AI generated voice clips. * A model that has AI generated textures, where the model is not AI generated. --- Listings that make use of 50% or more in it's creation must be clearly labeled as using AI generation or assistance in the listing description. Interpretation of what counts as "50% or more is" left solely to Linden Lab. Listings that use AI but under the 50% threshold are recommended, but not required, to disclose that AI is used in some capacity. In summary, it forbids listing of content on the marketplace, free or for sale, that is entirely AI generated, requires disclosure of AI generated content when AI does a majority of the work, and guards against some loopholes. This probably (as in, very likely. I feel this is implied, but just in case) isn't needed, but: Because this will probably get passed by the lawyers, I hereby grant all permission to Linden Lab to use or transform the above work in any way, without attribution or compensation. Linden Lab has the opportunity to deal with this now before it gets too out of control. Only a handful of residents would be in violation of this policy. This also only applies to marketplace stuff, not in-world content.
79
·
Marketplace
·
tracked
ADD Do Not Show "AI Generated" Filter on Marketplace
Please add a required bool while creating a Marketplace listing that asks the creator to disclose if AI generative tools were used in part/all of the products creation. Add this bool to the 'Do Not Show' section of the Marketplace search filter. Allow listings to be reported if they do not honestly disclose this. ---- For the health of the market we need the use of AI tools to be disclosed by creators. I would prefer personally that no AI generation be supported. I understand that tolorance of it is an effort to avoid censorships slippery slope, and is complicated by the sheer variation of AI tools that currently exist. But regardless of opinions or complications, it's existance cannot be ignored. So lets focus on what can be done, by giving some power of choice to the consumer instead. Users should be provided a way to choose products with or without AI generation while shopping, and naturally creators who choose not to disclose or to lie should face the same reportability and moderation as any other creator that would choose to lie while listing. The moderation half of this should not necessarily focus on trying to prove the use of AI gen tools, it doesn't actually need to. Creators who have done the work to provide support and actually prepare the AI generated content for its use in SL are unlikely to warrent being reported, and should not need to lie about the useage anyway. It is products that blatantly lack support, have egregious LOD & LI values that would be inclined to lie, and would want to be reported by users, this is the same for ANY product currently listed. If you buy it, and you don't get what was described, it should be reportable, the same goes for AI generated products, AI generated should not get a pass because you have to 'prove' something first, when the fact remains that you didn't get what thought you bought. So do not focus on "did you use a tool?" focus on "can you fix & support the product?" If it can't be supported, then disclose it was made via AI generation and move on. This is a similar complication to full perm and gacha resales, but also ripped models, copybot etc, in they will all lack support due to not being made directly by the creator of the listing. There is a big difference between fullperm & gacha resale vs ripping & botting, and that difference is honest disclosure.
325
·
tracked
Allow for reporting AI generated content marketplace listings or Video game model theft.
Every day I watch the "complete avatars" category on the marketplace Every day there's 5 new avatars, all game model rips, generated image ads, generated 3D model avatars, or a swath of wrongly categorized low effort AI content. There's a few small number of users uploading a massive amount of marketplace listing, all mass uploaded game rips, or generated avatars, so much so, that it completely overshadows any genuinely created user content. I used to look forward to seeing artistic creations, or originality, inventiveness and ingenuity. Now all I see is 100 low effort avatars, and 1 genuine avatar rarely posted once a month. Why would this suggestion help? 1.) Lowers mass storage of irrelevant content 2.) Creates relevance, and helps with the tagging system as a whole, enriching user interaction with the marketplace as a whole 3.) Allows for more creative content with worth and depth. I know there has been a few posts on this already, but quickly the marketplace has become the last place people are wanting to look when purchasing things from other users; it lowers profit, it lowers worth, it lowers desire to even use the platform. more and more people are choosing to only go to events instead of even looking at the marketplace. its quickly becoming almost useless for its intended purpose, if everything on there is just 1000 bland badly rigged fortnite avatars, game imports or randomly generated AI characters, again badly rigged. Quality over quantity, any day, please.
6
Load More