Web/Marketplace Features

Currently, there is no appropriate way to report cases where a Marketplace review is linked to an attempt at review manipulation. In some cases, reviewers offer to change their review in exchange for free products or upgrades. This constitutes review manipulation or extortion, yet none of the existing flagging categories apply to this situation. As a result, sellers have no effective way to report this behavior through the Marketplace system, and such reviews are not taken down. Please add a dedicated flagging category for “review manipulation” or “extortion”, and ensure these cases can be reviewed under Marketplace policy. This would help maintain fair and trustworthy reviews on the Marketplace.

In late 2024 Philip Rosedale asked if people wanted a list of how many people were in different regions, since this was data that the BonnieBots project was providing. https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:smfwaztduaoplofr5sg5ubtv/post/3ldoib7duwk24 April 15th 2026 LL has banned the BonnieBots and the owner, so now people like me who used the API that Bonniebots provided ( https://www.bonniebots.com/developers ), need a new source of this data. https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/Sim-Hopper-20-RLV-Group-Teleporter-Random-Region-Finder/27167620 For me I used the top 100/popular region API to make my SimHopper2.0 HUD work. I sincerely think it helped people find active events happening in real time - music events, educational events, social events etc. What I am looking for is the same data, a function where I can query like llpopularregion(x), where x represents the number in the top 1 to 100 most populated regions. example: llpopularregion(50) returns the region name of the region with the 50th highest users of a list of 100 currently most populated regions. It would also be useful to specify if the top 100 list result included scripted agents, so that you could do the query where the result included no scripted agents, real people + scripted agents, or only scripted agents. Additionally it would be useful to specify the maturity rating of the result - do you want results that include adult + general + moderate, or only general for example. This is similar to the strategy of exploring second life by opening the map and looking for clusters of green dots and going there. You don't know who they are, so this isn't a request for any personal information. It is just asking for data to see what regions are popular in real time.

Some time ago I've thought about how the marketplace could benefit some quick wins that should be fast to implement to improve how the product are shown to the user. This doesn't affect any backend features, these are just frontend edits. The attached picture includes some commentary.

A demo listing is often referenced by multiple objects, yet the link to go to the "full version" can only take you to one listing, and I believe it's the first item that referenced the demo that gets it. I propose to replace that link with a dropdown selection showing all products that reference the demo listing. See attachments for an example.

Please add a required bool while creating a Marketplace listing that asks the creator to disclose if AI generative tools were used in part/all of the products creation. Add this bool to the 'Do Not Show' section of the Marketplace search filter. Allow listings to be reported if they do not honestly disclose this. ---- For the health of the market we need the use of AI tools to be disclosed by creators. I would prefer personally that no AI generation be supported. I understand that tolorance of it is an effort to avoid censorships slippery slope, and is complicated by the sheer variation of AI tools that currently exist. But regardless of opinions or complications, it's existance cannot be ignored. So lets focus on what can be done, by giving some power of choice to the consumer instead. Users should be provided a way to choose products with or without AI generation while shopping, and naturally creators who choose not to disclose or to lie should face the same reportability and moderation as any other creator that would choose to lie while listing. The moderation half of this should not necessarily focus on trying to prove the use of AI gen tools, it doesn't actually need to. Creators who have done the work to provide support and actually prepare the AI generated content for its use in SL are unlikely to warrent being reported, and should not need to lie about the useage anyway. It is products that blatantly lack support, have egregious LOD & LI values that would be inclined to lie, and would want to be reported by users, this is the same for ANY product currently listed. If you buy it, and you don't get what was described, it should be reportable, the same goes for AI generated products, AI generated should not get a pass because you have to 'prove' something first, when the fact remains that you didn't get what thought you bought. So do not focus on "did you use a tool?" focus on "can you fix & support the product?" If it can't be supported, then disclose it was made via AI generation and move on. This is a similar complication to full perm and gacha resales, but also ripped models, copybot etc, in they will all lack support due to not being made directly by the creator of the listing. There is a big difference between fullperm & gacha resale vs ripping & botting, and that difference is honest disclosure.

Regrettably, a lot of merchants still don't have their demos labelled as demos, so that they can be excluded from search. However, there is no category to report such mis-classifications. We only have: Disallowed listing practices Demo not linked to full version But we are lacking: Disallowed listing practices Demo not classified as demo In order to help sanitize the Marketplace, users should be able to report those things.

Please consider allowing Premium Plus subscribers to claim their free commercial space directly from the Second Life website, similar to how Linden Homes are managed. Many of us manage real-life business schedules and can’t spend hours in-world 'sim-hopping' to find availability. A centralized web-based claim system would be much more efficient than flying through regions waiting for signs to rez.

The marketplace has a growing, serious problem with this deceptive listing practice, with stores adding ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ to their store name to imply that an item being shown in a search result is actually rated 5-stars, even when it is not. The number of stores engaging in this practice is shockingly large, with 'brands I've heard of' already doing it. The practice seems to only be growing. https://marketplace.secondlife.com/en-US/stores/store_name_search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&search%5Bsort%5D=&search%5Bkeywords%5D=%E2%AD%90 Other unicode symbols that should probably be disallowed: ⭐ 🌟 ✨ ★ ☆ ✪ ✯ ✭ ✰ ⚝ ✫ ☀ 🌞 �

There is no Dinkie category, so when we post our items on MP we have to use regular category for human sized clothes. It would be easier and less confusion on 'where' to post our items if we actually had a 'Dinkie' category to post them under. Thanks!

I'd like to see a creation date of items shown in the marketplace and the ability to search by year created.