Feature Requests

Support Hours For Premium Plus Need Corrected On Webpage. They are correct for Premium users but not Premium Plus

I did a search and I couldn't find any suggestions for this, which is surprising. Forgive me if I somehow missed another post and I am duplicating this request. Residents should be able to access more than 3 months worth of $L transaction history. Any transaction history feature in any bank, any business, any online platform anywhere else generally allows you to pull ALL transaction history from the beginning of the account. If it is a burden for LL to provide all history to everyone, it should at least progress beyond 3 months the higher up we go in Premium levels or for creators and other business owners who have need for those older transactions. For Premium Plus, we really should have all access to all records with no time limit. Premium should certainly have more than 3 months. That limit is simply not long enough.

https://lindenlab.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/31000173097-child-avatar-faq#Q%3A-How-do-you-define-a-child-avatar ? Letting the community to decide on this is a bad idea because in a modern society the witch hunting mob justice has been replaced by the rule of rational law for a good reason. Some people will use your chest size or height as the defining factor and others dont even want to see avatars having a cute round face on an adult body because their definition of an adult face is sunken-in cheeks and manly jaw line. It is all vague and up in the air and the most unhinged voices tend to be the loudest and dominant, so there needs to be some assurance that if an avatar is not an intentional representation of a literal child, it should not matter what it may look like to who, ageplay rules should not apply to avatars who do not have clothing or accessories generally associated with children or expressing child like speech and behaviors that are necessary for to fit the textbook definition of ageplay. As it is now, it makes life difficult for everyone involved, people whos avatar some karen deemed "child-like", pressure and headache for sim owners on who to let in, communities being wholesale banned form places, everyone on the edge about it, this schizophrenic zeitgeist is bad for everyone's mental health. Anime avatars are sometimes mistaken for something they arent by people that do not understand anime. Anime facial features such as a round face and large eyes or more realistic japanese body proportions such as a more realistic height and chest size are mistaken for "child-like" features when there are no such intention. Also this needs clarification "Note: Merely having a childlike avatar does not violate this policy. It is not our intent to banish childlike avatars in and of themselves." https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Official:Clarification_of_policy_disallowing_ageplay So merely having an avatar that some misinformed person deems "child-like" does not violate this policy in in terms of adult activity or general terms of this type of avatar simply existing? Does this mean adult activity is allowed? During the governance meeting "presenting as under 18" was thrown around in regards to avatar appearances, with no clarification given on what does that mean or who decides if what your avatar is "presenting" to be, is it up to the user or an arbitrary third party decision, and is "presenting as someone under 18" mean the same as "child-like" ? or are "child-like" avatars ok but the "presenting" ones not?

The official user group meetings are usually at 13:00 or 14:00 SLT/PT, which surely is convenient for Residents in the Americas, but highly inconvenient for dayjob-working Europeans, where 14:00 SLT/PT equals 23:00 CET. Moving the meetings forward just one hour (two hours would be better), would allow more European Residents to participate, while still being within US office hours.

some change in naming convention on version simulator

on https://secondlife.com/system-requirements as keeping it too low is not serving the community, especially because visual quality, speed or PBR can't fit. Time to use modern machines and Firestorm can confirm that their percentage of users with prehistorical computers is now getting close to 0. I think that 32-bit should no more be mentioned as 64-bit has been the standard now for long times and it would be time to talk not just resolution but GPU features too. Everyone here knows that being comfy with SL means having a GPU including 8GB VRAM, not to say also a bigger screen. It also means that most creators and more globally users having a portable computer even have 2 screens ! Mobile will be a totally different use focused mainly on the avatar.

https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Child_Avatar contradicts current ToS

https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Official:Clarification_of_policy_disallowing_ageplay The avatar appearance and content creation parts of the policy are coherent and makes sense, the child safety commitment part however is not. It is out of place and is conflating ageplay with things of real legal significance (like human trafficking) and other stuff that have nothing to do with ageplay or even child safety for that matter, this is inappropriate and should be revisited and maybe separated into its own category or made part of a more serious real life legal stuff category the same way you handle other legal issues. It also does nothing for child safety when people's attention and resources are tied up by micromanaging what 2 grown consenting adults say to each other while wearing this or that avatar. It should not be of LL's concern as long as: 1. No ageplay is being done, 2. No laws are being broken or 3. No actual minors being involved. Otherwise this overreach creates an atmosphere of unease within community about who reports you for what and how the person reviewing the report may interpret it.